Canadians Helping Canadians

Global Learning Giving Initiative

GLGI, a Canadian company, is pleased to present the "Global Learning Giving Initiative". This program is a unique opportunity that allows you to help Canadian charities provide Canadians access to computer based education and globally recognized certification. We are a trusted and leading group of experts with a passion to give, and assist those to achieve a higher quality of life.

More Information 

We have helped over 1 million Canadians acquire a higher education

Our donated courseware materials, support to outreach and resource centres as well as industry recognized certification programs, all work to empower the individual open new opportunities and promise a brighter quality of life for both the students and the larger community.

More Information

Why so many Canadians work with our program

The structure of the GLGI program has been created with the help of leading Canadian tax experts. Participation in the GLGI program is simple and starts by completing our application forms with a representative from your local area.

More Information

Make a difference in the lives of those in need

Charities play and important role in the Canadian society. Our federal and provincial governments provide generous tax incentives to encourage individuals to make contributions to registered charities.

More Information

Keep up with our latest achievements and involvements

Our GLGI Journal is designed to give you the inside story about the groups we are involved with, and how we helped change lives for the better. Also provided in the journals are valuable tax information, contest giveaways, and updates on our Learn To Earn program.

More Information

A chance to win outstanding prizes

We would like to thank you for your donations and support of our programs. If you submit a comment or an article idea, you will be entered in a draw to win a free laptop. We want the GLGI Journal and web site to be communication tools for you, your family and friends. E-mail or fax questions to GLGI. Your input makes all the difference.

More Information

Thu, Feb 23, 2012

Status-November 2011

There are still a few outstanding Undertakings however, most of them are complete. The lawyers are now engaged in the time-consuming task of sorting through all the information to determine what is relevant. It is also necessary to organize the documents.

GLGI has engaged the services of a former CRA employee to help the litigation team coordinate its efforts. He will also try to anticipate the kind of evidence the Department of Justice lawyers will rely on.

A number of donors and agents have asked for the names and contact information of the sixteen Appellants. We cannot provide this information.

We will make available to Head Fundraisers a copy of the Notice of Appeal with the names removed.

Status-August 2011

In our last report, we indicated that the final stage of discoveries (the delivery of answers to questions left unanswered at the oral examination) was to be completed at the end of this month but, it has now been extended to the end of August. GLGI has been assisting in the gathering of information and much of it has been forwarded to Baker & McKenzie, LLP (the lawyers acting for the Appellants). As far as we are aware, the CRA has not produced any of its required undertakings.

More importantly, the trial which was previously scheduled for this November will not be heard until June, 2012. Somewhat unusually, the trial will be split between Vancouver (where most of the Appellants reside) and Toronto (where most of the other witnesses reside).

The trial judge has been appointed. He is a relatively new judge however, he has some background in tax law and commercial law. He has also been on the board of a number of charities which may be beneficial.

Status-April 2011

We have just completed the oral portion of four “Examination for Discoveries” of donors and the Canada Revenue Agency auditor. This is the process in which the two sides are allowed to ask the other questions about their position. The idea is so that each side can know the case to be met; procure admissions to dispense with proof or destroy the other side’s case; or facilitate settlement. The CRA is considering whether it will ask the remaining appellants to answer written questions – which they are entitled to do since they did not conduct discoveries orally.

Based on the responses of the official from CRA, it seems that the Crown’s case is primarily based on two arguments. The primary line of argument is that the whole GLGI set up is a “sham”. That term has essentially been defined by the courts as acts done or documents executed by the parties which are intended by them to give appearance of creating between the parties legal rights and obligations different from the actual legal rights and obligations (if any) which the parties intended to create.

CRA’s second argument is that the value of the courseware distributed by the trust was only nominal.

Counsel is vigourously developing the case to counter the CRA’s positions on both these issues.

The trial is scheduled for mid-November in Vancouver and Toronto. There is much work that needs still to be done in preparation for the trial and your cooperation is much appreciated.

Status-May 2010

A number of our donors have requested that we update them periodically on the status of litigation. This is the first report, and we intend to issue reports on a periodic basis.

Background:

The tax dispute process is generally as set out below. (For more information, see our website www.glgi.ca).

1. CRA sends a letter requesting information from donors within a certain time frame.

2. Donors respond.

3. Regardless of the information provided by donors to CRA, CRA issues a "reassessment". This means they disagree with the donorís claim for a charitable deduction. It does not mean CRA is correct.

4. Within the next 90 days, the donor must file a Notice of Objection ("NOO") (see website for sample).

5. Once the NOO is filed, this suspends CRA's ability to collect taxes. (See letter dated March 2010 which describes the issues you should consider when determining whether you should pay or not). The vast majority of GLGI donors from prior years are at this stage. A lucky few perhaps 5-10%, never were reassessed within the appropriate timeframe. No one knows why.

 

Read more...

Status-August 2010

This is the second report on the on-going tax litigation involving sixteen GLGI donors, covering the 2004-2006 taxation years . Interestingly, after the initial confirmations of eighteen taxpayers in the fall of 2009, to our knowledge there have been no further confirmations issued. Of these eighteen, one taxpayer elected not to proceed to Tax Court, and another was derailed by procedural issues but is now back “on track” and is expected to be included with the other sixteen. The lawyers for GLGI and the Department of Justice had a “case management” meeting in June before a judge of the Tax Court. The purpose of these meetings is to set a timetable for the various steps in the litigation, either by agreement between the parties or by the judge if no agreement can be reached.

The following tentative timetable for the initial steps was agreed.

1. All relevant documents will be produced and exchanged by December 31, 2010. Unlike most civil trials, in Tax Court the parties can choose which documents they want to produce. (But if you do not produce them, it is very difficult to later rely on them at trial). Of course, the taxpayer is aware that CRA has already seen reams of documents – including emails – because of its powers to require the production of documents. Most taxpayers would tend to produce documents on the basis that CRA has already seen them.

2. Examinations for Discovery will be completed by March 31, 2011, with all follow-up questions completed by June 30, 2011. Examinations for discovery are an opportunity each side has to cross examine witnesses before trial to find further information. The Crown always chooses to examine one or more taxpayers. If the taxpayer does not know something; he is given the opportunity to find out the answer, if possible, and respond in writing. (The lawyers, in fact, do this). If this timetable is adhered to, the trial will likely be in the fall of 2011.